Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » General » Announcements




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Pixel scale
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 4:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:10 pm
Posts: 5
I am in the process of selecting a refractor for the a ZWO camera. I am confused about pixel scale. For example, articles prefer that you have a pixel scale of 2 arc-sec per pixel. The majority of the messier objects are very small, like M57 size is 1.4' by 1'. When I search the pictures and calculate the pixel scale is more like 0.6 arc-sec per pixel. Do I plan to have a focal length to get a better resolution of 0.6 arc-sec per pixel or go for the 2 arc-sec per pixel? I know you can add reducers and barlows but they don't cover the range from 0.6 arc-sec per pixel to 2 arc-sec per pixel. Thanks in advance for taking time to respond.


Top 
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Pixel scale
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Posts: 43
Location: St Leonards, Vic, Australia
Have a look at CCDCalc.
http://www.newastro.com/book_new/camera_app.html

This will guide you on the two variables you need to consider.
The pixel plate scale and the overall field of view.
The choice of plate scale is heavily influenced by your seeing conditions. If you had excellent seeing at say 1 arc sec, then a plate scale of around 0.4 arc sec/ pixel will gather as much detail as available.

The FOV should be large enough to cover the more interesting objects you want to image.
It's a compromise........

_________________
"Astronomical Spectroscopy -The Final Frontier" -to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before.
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs"
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital Spectroheliograph"


Top 
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Pixel scale
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:10 pm
Posts: 5
I did download the CCDCal program and find it useful. I am also reading an article from Craig Stark on signal to noise: Understanding it, measuring it, and improving it Part 4. Stan Moore page on pixel sampling is a good one to read. Thanks for your comments.


Top 
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Pixel scale
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:15 pm
Posts: 479
The bigger the resolution the way harder is to photograph DS objects. Very small DS objects require high resolution which is rarely used due to that difficulty level - and that's why DS imaging articles say about resolutions like 2 arcsec/pixel.

With current CMOS based cameras it's easier to photograph DS objects on high resolutions by lucky imaging - instead of few long exposed frames you take a lot of very short frames and stack that (rejecting bad ones too). This avoids seeing image distortion as well as tracking error. Bigger than usual aperture is also very much welcomed for this too.


Top 
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

Board index » General » Announcements


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: